Blogging :: Innovative way of Information Sharing - Technical articles

Friday, February 04, 2005

Group of Seven Club Coming Under Pressure to Expand Its Ranks

Group of Seven Club Coming Under Pressure to Expand Its Ranks
Feb. 4 (Bloomberg)

The Group of Seven industrial nations, a club of the world's wealthiest nations that dates back to the 1970s, meets under mounting pressure to bring its membership up to date to reflect growth of economies such as China and India.

U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, who chairs Friday and Saturday's gathering in London, has invited China, India, Brazil and South Africa to some of the talks amid what a British Treasury official described as a recognition among finance ministers that they need to engage with emerging economies. Former U.S. and U.K. treasury officials and economists from Morgan Stanley and HSBC Holdings Plc say the group's present structure looks increasingly anachronistic, with nations such as Canada and Italy holding on to seats at the table while China, the world's fastest-growing major economy with more than $600 billion of foreign currency reserves, is relegated to guest status.

``The G-7 now includes the world's richest countries, but not necessarily the most important or dynamic countries,'' said Stephen King, chief economist at HSBC, the world's second-largest bank. ``If there is going to be a proper discussion from a trade and capital markets perspective, countries such as China, India, and Brazil need to be included. They will have a bigger and bigger influence on the Western world.''

Officials in some G-7 countries have expressed caution about formalizing the membership of any additional countries. The British official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the G- 7 remains an informal gathering, where issues that affect the richest countries are discussed and that other countries will be invited when there is a need to interact.
`Continuing Outreach'

John Taylor, the U.S. Treasury's undersecretary for international affairs who will represent Treasury Secretary John Snow at this weekend's meeting, said the G-7 is already inviting nations such as China and Brazil to summits as ``part of a continuing outreach.'' After the Sept. 11 attacks, nations with expertise on terrorist financing were invited to the G-7 and last year African nations attended, he said.

G-7 finance ministers and central bank governors will meet their counterparts of India, Brazil, China and South Africa for a working breakfast on Saturday. There will also be an additional G- 7 China lunch during the weekend.

``It's an opportunity for China to be part of the discussions as it's becoming more significant in the world economy,'' said Taylor in an interview.
Chinese Growth

China, the world's seventh-largest economy, may grow 8.5 percent this year, slowing from expansion of 9.5 percent in 2004, the economic forecasting department of the State Information Center said on Monday. On the same day, India revised its economic growth for the last financial year ended March 31, 2004, to 8.5 percent from its previous estimate of 8.2 percent.

The U.S. will grow by 3.3 percent this year, the 12 nations sharing the euro by 1.9 percent and Japan by 2.1 percent, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's latest forecasts published in November.

Richard Portes, director of the Centre for Economic Policy Research, an association of academic and central bank economists headquartered in London, said the G-7 has failed over the last two years to stem the dollar's 18 percent decline because the country which could most influence its future, China, only attended meetings for the first time last October in Washington.
``Global macro imbalances are too important to leave to a body that doesn't decide anything,'' he said.

Louvre Accord

In 1985, the G-7 agreed at the Plaza Hotel in New York to coordinate a decline in the dollar through a series of statements and sales of other currencies. Less than two years later, the G-7 met at the Louvre Palace in Paris and signaled that the exchange rate movement had gone far enough.

``The last time the dollar was out of line with fundamentals, the G-7 was able to solve the problem,'' said Philip Lane, a professor of international macroeconomics at Trinity College, in the University of Dublin. ``Now they can't do anything without China.''

For more than a year, the G-7 has urged China to inject ``flexibility'' into an exchange-rate system that since 1995 has tied the yuan to the dollar. That artificially depresses its value, G-7 officials say, handing Chinese manufacturers an unfair trade advantage.
The Chinese government promised to ``push ahead firmly and steadily'' toward a market-based currency, yet gave no timetable for easing the peg, when it attended the last G-7 meeting in October. Its foreign currency reserves swelled more than 50 percent last year and are now worth almost three-quarters the value of the annual output of Canada, one of the G7 members. Its economy has quadrupled in size since 1978, according to the IMF.

G-7 Plus Four?

Proposals to reform the group range from trimming meetings down to include only representatives from the 12-nation euro region, the U.S., Japan and China to broadening them to include the current G-7 plus up to four countries more.

A report released last year, whose four authors included former U.S. Treasury undersecretary for international affairs Jeffrey Shafer, now at Citigroup Inc., and Nigel Wicks, a former U.K. Treasury official who's now deputy chairman of securities settlement company Euroclear, suggested a two-tier approach.
Wicks, who worked as deputy to five British chancellors of the exchequer at G-7 summits, and Shafer, who has also served at the Federal Reserve, said a new G-4 club, comprising the U.S., Japan, the euro area and China, should deal with global currency issues.

Financial Council

In addition, a broader Council for International Financial and Economic Co-operation should be introduced, the article said, which would represent no more than 15 nations and oversee the global financial system.

``There are new actors coming onto the scene,'' said Wicks, in a telephone interview. ``You can't get away from the fact that China has an enormous effect on the world economy -- it's a significant player on the world markets. I wouldn't rule out India joining the G-4 when it's quite clear that its currency is having the impact on the world that China does.''

The case for expansion or change isn't as clear-cut as some suggest, said Anthony Navaneelan, chairman of the G8 Research Group of the University of Toronto.

Many G-7 countries and particularly the U.S. are concerned that opening the doors to new members will make the meetings, which are informal and don't have their own bureaucracy, unwieldy and potentially confrontational, said Navaleenen.

`Logical Step'

A report by Morgan Stanley Chief Economist Stephen Roach released in December said the G-7 should be pared back to a G-5 comprising the U.S., the euro region, Japan, the U.K. and China. The ``time is long overdue for a serious revamping of the global policy architecture,'' he said.

Jonathan Story, professor of international political economy at the INSEAD business school in Paris and author of the 2003 book ``China: the Race to Market,'' said change to the G-7 is inevitable. The world's most populous nation is eager to boost its prestige on the international stage and has already begun to flex its muscles by joining the World Trade Organization and boosting regional ties in Asia.

``Joining the G-7 and the G-8 is the next logical step to becoming a key player in the global system,'' said Story. ``They want to play in the top league and India as well.''

Developed nations should practice what they preach - Indian Finance Minister

Developed nations should practice what they preach: Indian Finance Minister
London, February 4, 200510:07 IST

India has asked the developed countries to implement their part of obligations under the WTO, reduce agriculture subsidy and make their market accessible to developing countries.

Speaking on 'India and Globalisation' at the Foreign Policy Centre, an European think tank with a global outlook, in London on Thursday evening, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said: "We abide by every obligation under the WTO. Yet we are denied of market access (by developed countries). A lot must change. There is a lot of talk but very little action".

He said, "India accepts and willingly embraces the imperative of globalisation. We do so in our self-interest. The real question is the terms of engagement in globalisation.

"As of today, the terms are heavily weighted in favour of the developed countries. Millions of people in the developing countries, and in the least developed countries, watch in silence, and with a growing sense of bitterness, that the age of prosperity is passing them by. This does not augur well for either globalisation or stability."

Asking the developed countries to review the process of globalisation, Chidambaram said: "I urge you to renew the process by making it more inclusive, more just and more equitable."
Chidambaram, who will represent India as an invitee at the two-day meeting of the G-7 rich nations beginning in London on Friday, said the foreign policy centre was well placed to take a leadership role in this behalf and India would be very happy to work with it in areas of mutual interest.Along with India, the G-7 has invited China, Brazil, Russia and South Africa for the meeting.


The Indian Finance Minister indicated that his efforts to broad base the tax collection in the country. Last time he had succeeded in increasing the number of persons covered under taxation from 1.2 million to 25 to 30 million and "we have to raise it to 50 million."
In a lighter vein, he told the audience that he would welcome any suggestion for broadening the tax net.


To a query, Chidambaram said the previous NDA government believed in privatisation being an end in itself. "Our coalition does not believe in the privatisation for the sake of privatisation. Our policy is that public sector will occupy an important place in Indian economy and profit-making public sector units will not be privatised. They can go to market and raise funds. Only loss making units will be sold off."

India to get MiG-29 Fighter Air Crafts for Admiral Gorshkov War Ship

India to get MiG-29 Fighter Air crafts for Admiral Gorshkov War Ships:
Posted online: Friday, February 04, 2005 at 1419 hours IST

Moscow, February 4: India would start receiving 16 MiG-29K fighters from Russia in 2007 for deployment on aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov.

Russia's MiG corporation has been developing 12 carrier-based MiG-29K single seater fighters with multi-role capabilities and four twin-seater MiG-29KUB combat-cum-trainer aircraft as a part of the USD 1.5 billion Gorshkov deal signed in January 2004.


'The serial production of the planes has already commenced, the work is moving ahead strictly per-schedule,' Director General of Rac MiG, Alexei Fedorov told reporters here, allaying fears about a delay in the deliveries due to financial problems of the corporation.

Fedorov, who has been the pointman in the successful implementation of Sukhoi SU-30MKI deal, was appointed MiG chief last year by the Russian government to salvage MiG-29K deal with India. "

Sunday, January 30, 2005

A Bigger India: Quest For A New Identity

A Bigger India: Quest For A New Identity
(Time of India)

"Why do you insist on calling me an NRI?" said the Mysore-born, Pune-graduated, NYC-chiselled, Seattle-based high-flier. He was very much like Pico Iyer's global soul or Steven Spielberg's 'terminal' man, who took the idea of home to every nook, corner, and airport he visited. He was neither American nor Indian. He called himself a floating citizen of the world. With a new set of home-truths, he began unravelling a vision called India. In essence, he was an MRI (multi- resident Indian). The Manmohan Singh administration had taken the idea of MRI forward when it granted him dual citizenship.

To his RI (resident Indian) friends, he was a simple statistic. Spread across the globe, predominantly in North America, his fellow PIOs (people of Indian origin) have an annual income totting up to $370 billion. But seen in the context of India, whose GDP is around $570 billion, their earnings acquire a new meaning. They quickly up India's GDP to $940 billion. "Statistics only give you part of the story," said the MRI. Just imagine PIO earnings equalling, or doubling, India's in the next few years. That success story is my Vision India. India is about cultural plurality seeking distinct global identities; it's about realising its das-avatar across the globe. India's multiplicity is evident in squalor, splendour, sculpture, software, and spirituality. Its persona is as singular as the Taj and as diverse and versioned as an open-source code."

In India's diversity lies its invisibility. It must become as palpable and poignant as it becomes imperious and invisible. "India's concerns are borderless; they have a global dimension. It must provide space and voice to its global envoys, the diaspora, in Parliament. It's a constituency that will outgrow India in influence in a few years. Why not create a third house? You could call it Vishwa Sabha, after Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Vishwa Sabha will help Parliament to focus on Boston and California, instead of being obsessed with Bihar and Kashmir".

Of course, the idea of Vishwa Sabha is not just restricted to India. "It would in due course be visible in US Congress and European parliaments as well. It's already happening from within the well-encrusted diamond diaspora, the ever-replicating software community, and the infectious academic. They have already made Vision India tangible through their presence, size, and influence. Soon, legislators like Bobby Jindal will have a bigger say. And as local issues become global concerns, legislators could cross-represent economies. Why can't Congressman Bobby Jindal become an Indian MP as well?"

The individual has already woken, and is waking the nation to a bigger opportunity. "Look at me," said the MRI, describing his economic pilgrimages across the world. "I have an invisible citizenship. I visit Vietnam and the Philippines regularly to scout for outsourcing opportunity; I'm in China once a month to supervise manufacturing tie-ups; Warsaw and Istanbul are second homes; Hyderabad and Bangalore will soon be on my frequent-flier schedule. I am just a unit of the diaspora. As an Indian, I have instinctively learnt to develop roots in cultural plurality, barter my identity in a borderless world, and distinguish myself in free-market global capitalism."

It is not the Indian who makes India but "India" makes the Indian, says Raja Rao. By India, Rao does not mean a country, but a 'perspective' and a 'mood'. "Today this perspective is defined by the Indian. It's through his Indianness that the world is seeing, and seeking, India. India is a collection of virtual nation-states both inside and outside. Inside, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Gurgaon are becoming global econo-mic engines. Outside, the diaspora is spawning mini-Indias from San Jose to Montreal to London to Dubai to Singapore to Melbourne. It's a fresh perspective of India seen through the evolution, and contribution, of the global Indian," explained the MRI.

India's entrepreneurial spirit, its soluble culture, its adaptable identities, and its ambition to grow even bigger are not threats to global society. They are the abiding traits of globalisation. India's new mood must be that of imperialism. But India must distinguish between the zeal of Alexander and the resolve of Ashoka. The idea of Vishwa Sabha, Parliament's new avatar, is not just about providing a voice to the diaspora. It's about focusing on India's domestic economic engines and its influential international communities to redraw the map of India; it's about seeking a new role; it's about mixing liquid localism with a natural global ethos to create an empire of Indianness; it's about a quest for an Indian self. Indeed, it's just about the quest; for, the quest to be different is India's underlying identity.

The MRI was in a hurry to put India's quest in perspective. "Guess what? 'The enormity of Vision India comes from the origin of the word itself', says my Swedish friend. Sindhu, as the first Indians visualised it, was not a river but a sea."

As the history of India shows, the sea was never an illusion, always a reality. The true spirit of India is its enormity. Borderless in geography, inclusive in culture, cosmic in character, India even transcends the notion of India. That's its peculiarity.